Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran
Abstract
Highlights
-
Keywords
Article Title [Persian]
Authors [Persian]
یادگیری ریاضیات فرصتهای مناسبی ایجاد میکند تا دانشآموزان شایستگیهای کلیدی برای زندگی در قرن بیستویکم را در خود رشد دهند. برنامه ریزان درسی نیاز به تلاشهای جدیتری برای بروزرسانی آموزش ریاضیات از نظر محتوی و تکنیک ارائه دارند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، مطالعه تطبیقی عناصر برنامهدرسی ریاضی دوره ابتدایی در ایران و سنگاپور در چهار مؤلفه اهداف، محتوا، روشهای تدریس و شیوههای ارزشیابی بود. روش پژوهش تطبیقی کیفی - با بهرهگیری از رویکرد چهار مرحلهای بردی - و استراتژی انتخاب نمونه پژوهش "نظام های اجتماعی متفاوت، برون دادهای آموزشی متفاوت" است. دادهها، با استفاده از اسناد و اطلاعات موجود در پایگاههای رسمی دولتی و کتب و نشریات مرتبط با موضوع تحقیق در بازدهزمانی 2021-2000 جمعآوری شده و براساس روش توافق / اختلاف جان استوارت میل تحلیل گردیدند. یافتهها نشان داد کشورهای منتخب به پرورش مهارتهای تفکر و فعالیتهای خلاقانه در اهداف تأکید دارند و هم چنین محتوای کتاب های ریاضی بر مبنای اهداف آموزشی تعیین شده اند. مهمترین تفاوت بین دو کشور ، در هدف حمایت از روش " حلمسئله " برای ایجاد انسجام بین محتوا و مهارتها در سنگاپور است. همچنین در مقایسه با ایران ، نظام آموزشی سنگاپور به تفاوت-های فردی دانشآموزان در محتوا و توسعهی فراشناخت در راهبردهای یادگیری توجه بیشتری کرده است. علاوه بر این در نظام آموزشی ایران، ارزشیابی تأکید کمتری بر کیفیت یادگیری دانشآموزان دارد. با توجه به یافتهها و به منظور ارتقای کیفیت آموزش ریاضیات، به برنامه ریزان درسی ایران توصیه میشود محتوی و شیوههای نوین آموزش ریاضی را مدنظر قرار دهند.
Keywords [Persian]
Primary education, as one of the most important educational level, requires innovative support in the curriculum to create rich and enjoyable learning conditions. In this stage, in addition to the formation of personality and all-round inclusive development, most basic skills and attitudes of pupils are also formed (Caldwell, 2019). That is why modern societies are constantly striving to adapt educational systems to global conditions so that learners - as 21st century citizens - with flexible thought have demonstrated all their ability to understand and apply concepts and gain practical and cognitive experiences (Abramovich et al., 2019; Brezovnik, 2015). In the meantime, teaching mathematics - as an activity that involves the participation of thought processes in problem solving - can create a variety of learning opportunities; encourage children to discover, recognize and structure their knowledge; and while gaining skills appropriate to the needs of the present time helped them to better understand their abilities (Battelle for Kids.org, 2014); Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021). In fact, mathematics is a universal language, and its role and place - as a subject and a natural flow in human thought - is formed from the child's first experiences of playing with simple patterns and can gradually take the form of creative "activity." In addition to stimulating the mind and making knowledge attractive, it is also effective in strengthening the power of foresight and problem solving (Derosa, 2017; Gholam-Azad & Gooya, 2016). In other words, "Mathematics as an art and a system of ideas" (Borel, 2017: 28), can both strengthen the power of reasoning and establish an intellectual order in students, and in all aspects of education and life (Coffland & Xie, 2015). In fact, the purpose of mathematics education is not only to maintain and learn basic skills, but also to identify the causes of misunderstandings in teaching, to provide learning opportunities for understanding and applying skills that require in-depth insight and more rational and creative (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021). Although standards of curriculum emphasize the importance of conceptual understanding of mathematical problems (Schoenfeld, 2007; Wynn & Harris, 2012), but At the same time, researchers' findings reveal that curriculum planners, teachers, and parents face many challenges in teaching children math (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005; Coffland & Xie, 2015; Willoughby, 2010). One of these problems is the lack of connection between the content of the math lesson and pupils’ real life (Coffland & Xie, 2015: 311). Research shows that daily life is full of problems that require use of mathematical reasoning, and therefore school curriculum should provide the ability to apply mathematics to prepare students for real-life situations (Stacey, 2005; Pea & Martin, 2010; Esmonde et al. 2013; Liao, 2016). Another challenge is the lack of connection between mathematical concepts in different educational stage (DeRosa, 2017).
A coherent curriculum should be interconnected through different educational backgrounds so that students gain a deeper understanding of the concepts (CCSS, 2014). The third challenge is lack of integrating mathematics curricula with other subjects (Coffland & Xie, 2015; Brezovnik, 2015). Yekman (2012) claims that when knowledge is transferred from one discipline to another, we gain greater depth of knowledge that can be used in the real world. Therefore, less attention to these challenges can gradually have a negative effect on development of metacognition and thinking skills in learners (Bakhshalizadeh & Broojerdian, 2017). The results of international tests also indicate an unfavorable trend in mathematics education in many countries, including Iran (Mullis et al., 2019; Minaei et al., 2013). Shirazi et al. (2016) showed that part of students’ poor performance in “Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study” (TIMSS) tests is due to educational approaches and methods that play a key role in meaningful understanding and generalization of students' learning. In this regard, Rafiepour & Goya (2012) and Kasiani & Zarei (2012) have stated that Iranian students perform poorly in international exams due to their lack of skills in comprehension, analysis and inference of mathematical problems. Yazdani & Hassani (2011) also confirms the fact that in Iran, different areas of educational goals in primary school curricula are not balanced and less attention has been paid to attitudinal objectives. In other goals, the attainment of the minimum qualifications has been satisfied. This discrepancy also exists between the content of math textbooks and learning objectives with the reality of educational environments - such as teachers’ expertise and beliefs, students' needs, and teaching time (Azizi Mahmoudabad & Nili, 2019; Dehghani & Safdari, 2014).
In this regard, Singapore has been able to deepen knowledge and understanding of its students by demonstrating thinking skills and strengthening a positive attitude towards mathematics. The education system of this country has been able to take mathematics learning to the next level while earning top rankings in international examinations like TIMSS & “Programme for International Student Assessment” ( PISA) (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021; Lee, 2019; Wong et al, 2019). This fact reveals the need for a comparative study of the Iran mathematical education system and its comparison with the performance of developed countries, such as Singapore. This study helps curriculum planners to draw a comprehensive map of the desired situation in the objectives and pillars of the mathematics curriculum. Therefore, it is necessary to review previous research systematically, and to extract, analyze and evaluate existing lessons in order to provide an optimal method for mathematics education in Iran. The main purpose of study was to find out what are the main similarities and differences between primary school mathematics curriculum of Iran and Singapore. To answer this question and its dimensions, the sub-questions of the research were organized as follows:
The purpose of study was to compare the mathematics curriculum in primary school in Iran and Singapore. For this purpose, the present study is a comparatively qualitative research using method of George, F. Bereday (1969), in four stages of description, interpretation, juxtaposition and comparison. The research sample was selected based on the strategy of "different social systems, different educational outcomes". Data were collected using documentary methods from databases of governmental institutions and organizations, books and publications. In Iran, information bases such as “National Curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran” (2013), the “Document of Fundamental Transformation of Iran's Education” (Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution, 2011), Mathematics Teachers Handbook, the “Organization for Educational Research and Planning” and in Singapore, the resources available in the information bases of Singapore Primary Mathematics (2021), and the “National Council of Teachers of Mathematics” (NCTM) were used. The internal and external validity of the documents were examined. To determine internal validity, the accuracy of documents and for external validity, the importance degree of documents was evaluated. Data were analyzed using the John Stuart Mill agreement / disagreement method (Finn, 2010).
This section contains information on the four steps of description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison. In the first step, the current state of the primary education system in Iran and Singapore is briefly explained. Then, at two stages of interpretation and juxtaposition, the elements of mathematics curriculum – i.e. goals, content, teaching methods and evaluation methods – in both countries are examined. Finally, in the comparison phase, the results of the similarities and differences between the two countries in terms of mathematical curriculum elements are presented.
At this stage, information about characteristics of the selected educational systems is provided.
In Iran primary education, the process of planning, compiling, printing and supervising school textbooks is carried out directly under the Ministry of Education, and all schools are required to implement it. Decisions on the adoption of rules and regulations are also in the hands of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution and Higher Council of Education (Askari, Elahimanesh & Parizad, 2019). In the National Curriculum Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2013), the student is defined as a divine trust that has the ability to flourish and materialize. The teacher is also a role model who, by recognizing and creating educational opportunities, provides chances to increase learners' motivation for intellectual, faith, scientific, practical, and moral development (Supreme Council of Education, 2013). According to upstream documents, the mission of primary education is to nurture the talents of learners by creating appropriate opportunities for teaching / learning. In addition, the importance of learning values and cultural heritage and a common language for the development of national identity is emphasized (Salsabili, 2017). Pupils are expected to achieve a level of basic competencies during their school years (Supreme Council of Education, 2013). In Iran, the age of entering primary school is six years old and the length of this period is 6 years. Primary education is divided into two separate three-year stages: First stage (first, second, third grade) and second stage (including fourth, fifth, sixth grade). Common subjects in all grades are reading and writing, math, science, art, and the Quran. In the third grade, the subject of social education, and in the sixth grade, the subjects of work and technology and thinking & research are added. Out of a total of 24 educational hours per week, in the first and second grades, 5 hours and in the other grades 4 hours is dedicated to mathematics (Askari et al, 2019).
In this country, the Ministry of Education has a very active role in the management of schools and curriculum (Elmore, 2004). Mathematics courses are prepared and designed by the Ministry of Education in collaboration with the “University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate” and notified to schools. Also, this course is reviewed periodically every six years to ensure that it is appropriate to prepare students to meet global challenges and align with national goals. In the event of a need for change, often the core of the curriculum remains constant in the reform process (Kaur, 2013). In this country, education is a continuous movement towards learning, participation and innovation (Askari et al, 2019). This dynamism in the education system has improved curricula across schools (Wong et al, 2016). Establish a perfect relationship with other countries and while investing in research centers, Singapore spread ideas such as “creative thinking” and "less teaching, more learning" at the school level (Wong et al, 2019).
Primary education programs in this country are based on modern learning and assessment standards (Al-Jaafari, 2017). Other characteristics of Singapore's primary education system include teaching the characteristics of multinational and multicultural societies, as well as adhering to a bilingual policy in the country. The goal of learning a mother tongue - such as Chinese, Malaysian or Tamil - is to return to identity, and values (Caldwell, 2019). One of the most important educational goals of this country is to help discover the talents of children and to pay attention to individual differences in the ability and speed of learning. In the changing global context, this country has considered the goals and visions of its education system in accordance with the needs of the twenty-first century (Wong et al., 2019) and based on the vision of " Thinking Schools, Learning Nation " ( Caldwell, 2019). The purpose of this educational system is to raise children whose learning never stops (Deng, Gopinathan & Lee, 2013). This approach, based on professional advancement and personal enrichment, determines continuous progress in this country (Hallinger 2005; Leithwood et al, 2004). In Singapore, the age of entering primary school is six years and its length is also six years, with pupils taking four years as an introductory stage and a two-year course with the aim of choosing a major. At the end of the sixth year, pupils have to participate at the “Primary School Leaving Examination” (PSLE) (UNESCO-IBE, 2007). Although mathematics is a compulsory subject in this country, its breadth and depth depend on the learners' abilities. Math classes are 4 hours per week in the first and second grades and 5 hours per week in other grades of primary schools of Singapore. In Singapore, all subjects - except mother tongue - are taught and evaluated in English so that students have sufficient proficiency in it - which is the language of business, science and technology (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2019).The development of information and communication technology is one of the pillars of Singapore, so that in the 1990s the term " Intelligent Island " was used to refer to this country, because the country was able to quickly adapt to the world of the Internet (Shekarbaghani, 2012: 57)
1-Goals
Iran:
In the curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran, mathematics is defined as the science of patterns and communication, a way of thought, a regular art with internal consistency, and an accurate tool for defining terms and symbols. The purpose of mathematics education is to train people who can reason logically, have the power to decompose and abstract, to construct a comprehensive theory of external phenomena, and to be able to apply mathematics to solve daily life problems ( Supreme Council of Education, 2013). In Iran, there is a formal mathematics curriculum that outlines the content objectives, concepts, and skills that need to be learned (Reyhani, 2016). In addition, the main purpose of teaching mathematics is to develop acquired thoughts and thinking skills in learners, so that they can communicate creatively and find appropriate solutions to problems by strengthening their predictive power (Alamian, 2012; Gooya, 2010). The National Curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2012) emphasizes that mathematical concepts should be taught in the context of concepts related to other scientific fields. However, how the mathematics curriculum relates horizontally to other subjects is not specified and is taught independently (Higher Council of Education, 2012).
Singapore
In this country, in addition to the framework set by the Ministry of Education, schools can continuously refine, review and change the objectives of mathematics education by determining the appropriate perspective with the context and location of each school (Fullan, 2006: 157). Therefore, the mathematics curriculum in the primary school of this country does not consider any formal education. The main focus of the objectives in this curriculum is to develop vital mathematical processes so that with the growth of 21st century competencies and the development of great ideas in mathematics, it can create a deep knowledge and understanding of mathematics in students (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021). Although the primary goal of mathematics education in Singapore is problem solving, learning concepts and learning thinking and problem-solving skills and strengthening, a positive attitude toward mathematics have also been important (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021; Kaur, 2013). Levels of goals in this subject are based on the principle of "Mathematics for all, advanced mathematics for some" (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2013). This spiral approach allows higher concepts and skills to be built on a more basic basis and learned over a period of time. These goals, which are developed with a strong foundation in mathematics to strengthen three broad levels of mathematics education, are categorized as follows:
A- Basic goals (strong foundation):
B- Secondary goals (strengthening abilities)
Level 1- The purpose of teaching mathematics is to enable all students to
Level 2 - Supplementary Mathematics helps talented and interested students to:
Level 3- Math curriculum provides opportunity for students interested in vocational education:
2- Content
Iran
In this country, most educational activities take place within the framework of the school textbook, so the content of textbook has a special role and position in the learning process. According to the recommendation of the National Curriculum Document, the content of mathematics is divided into two general parts: Mathematical concepts and processes (Higher Council of Education, 2012) (Table 1).
Table 1
Content Framework in Iran Primary Mathematics Curriculum
Component |
Main Focus |
Dimensions |
Learn numbers & numerical calculations; Geometry, measurement & analysis of data and probabilities |
Mathematical concepts
|
Content |
Problem solving, reasoning and critical thinking (including generalization, prediction, hypothesizing, guessing and testing conjectures, explaining and confirming answers, categorizing, comparing, and use of patterns), visual thinking and creative thinking ( includes spatial reasoning, visual patterns, problem-solving in real and fictional story and context), mathematical discourse (including communication, mathematical reading and writing), and use of new technology in mathematics. |
Mathematical processes |
Source: Higher Council of Education, 2012
According to the content division in Table 1, mathematical concepts are divided into six branches: Numbers and numerical calculations, algebra and symbolic representation, geometry, measurement, statistics and probabilities, and mathematical history. Each of these concepts - in Grades 1-6 - has different levels, so educational programs and activities should be such that pupils have the ability to relate to the skills associated with each subject. The National Curriculum (2012) also emphasizes the horizontal relationship of mathematical content with other subjects. Accordingly, mathematical concepts should be taught in the context of concepts related to other scientific fields. The second part includes acquiring skills in mathematical processes. In recent years, reforms have been made to the content of math textbooks to address open-ended questions and to encourage students to explore different methods of answering. These topics have been addressed in some sections using open-ended questions and answers, problem-solving lessons, unconventional problems in mathematics, although the emphasis on the problem-solving process in content is not such that encourage discovery and innovation and develop thinking skills in learners (Reyhani, 2016).
Singapore
In this country, the main focus of content - as one of the elements of the mathematics curriculum - is on the development of competence in problem solving (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021) (Table 1).
Table 2
Content Framework in Singapore Primary Mathematics Curriculum
Component |
Main focus |
Dimensions
|
Attitude: Beliefs, interest, appreciation, trust, perseverance |
Solve math problem |
Content |
Concepts: Numerical, algebraic, geometric, statistical and analytical probability, calculations |
||
Processes: Reasoning, Communication and Connection, Thinking Skills, Approaches, Applications and Modeling |
||
Skills: Ability to do numerical calculations, grammar and spatial representations, data analysis, measurement, use of mathematical tools, estimation |
||
Metacognition: Monitoring your thinking, self-discipline in learning |
Source: Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021
The content framework of the Singapore Mathematics Curriculum consists of five interrelated components that, as a reflection of needs of the 21st century curriculum, provide a guide to teaching, learning and evaluating mathematics at all levels of education - from primary to pre-university. According to this framework, mathematical processes refer to the skills of using mathematical knowledge as an important part of the content and include reasoning, communication, applications & thinking and exploration skills that are important in solving mathematical problems and beyond. In primary school, pupils learn these skills through problem solving. They learn to work logically, to express their thoughts in writing and orally, and by using patterns and observing similarities and differences between mathematical ideas and life. In fact, problem solving as a central focus in content, in addition to strengthening mathematical skills and processes, emphasizes the development of attitudes and self-regulated learning. Also, this type of connection, with a deeper understanding of concepts, leads to the development of different mathematical ideas through exposure to a variety of useful experiences and activities. In addition, the problem-solving approach - while enhancing students' confidence and interest in mathematics - creates an interdisciplinary approach that links mathematics to real life and other school subjects (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021).
3- Learning-teaching strategies
Iran
According to the National Curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2012), in order to learn mathematical concepts in depth, students must act like a researcher and in the process of teaching-learning, discover how new concepts occur and how can be used with and generalized. In this program, students must be able to construct concepts during the process of solving a significant problem and play an active, voluntary, and conscious role in the teaching-learning process. The program also emphasizes the strengthening of the spirit of inquiry in teaching process to increase motivation of students - through exploration - to provide the ground for their effective interaction with the teacher, peers and learning environments (Council of Education, 2012). In the real situation, the use of active teaching-learning methods is lacking in most math classrooms in Iran, and this process is done in a traditional way with an emphasis on student memory. In the traditional method, the teacher's focus is more on explaining the contents of the book, and pupils solve problems and exercises in the ways that the teacher says. If the new lesson is related to the previous lessons, the teacher will first review the previous material and then explain the new lesson. The presentation is usually lecturing and teacher-centered. During teaching, the teacher - for example asks some questions and then solve them. Students solve book exercises -which were not available time in the classroom - at home (Seifi, 2018; hajizadeh, 2013; Navidy, 2013).
Singapore
In Singapore, the method of teaching mathematics provides opportunities for students to achieve the skills necessary for life in the 21st century. As students engage in problem-solving, reasoning, critical thinking, and communication, they discover different ways to solve a problem and to demonstrate it in the real world. This learning method helps students engage in creative thinking and learn how to articulate a problem and manage its complexity (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021). Math teaching methods are done in three stages of preparation, engagement and mastery in teaching:
4- Evaluation
Iran
In the National Curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2013), qualitative evaluation is done in three ways: Formative, diagnostic and cumulative:
In Iran, despite the emphasis on descriptive assessment in primary school and the importance of selectivity and self-management in the continuous growth of students in this course, traditional assessment is still very important in schools. Teachers use traditional methods to assess students by emphasizing book or similar problems and exercises, and there is a tendency to conduct exams in the manner of convergent and stereotype questions (Golpoushnejad, 2016; Shirazi et al., 2016). On the other hand, the performance of Iranian students in the TIMSS 2007-2019 among 58 countries was lower than the global average. For example, in the preliminary results of the TIMSS 2019, Iranian pupils ranked 50th out of 58 countries in the fourth grade math exam (Mullis et al, 2019; Shirazi et al, 2016). The repetition of these undesirable outcomes is influenced by assessment methods, and teachers' extreme emphasis on students' memorization of book content (Shirazi et al, 2016).
Singapore
In Singapore, assessment is an integral part of the interactive teaching and learning process. This continuous process gathers information about students' learning, so that while identifying learning gaps, methods can be considered to improve it. In this system, although it is necessary to know what skills the student has acquired in the learning phase, it is equally important that she/he be involved in peer assessment or self-assessment as part of the learning process (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2021). In the assessment process, students become more active in the learning process by being aware of their level of learning, while focusing on the quality of learning (Lee, 2019; Ministry of Education Singapore, 2013). In the Singaporean education system, the evaluation book is placed next to other textbooks - including mathematics - and covers all subjects and workbook activities (Caldwell, 2019). This book includes additional questions and issues, conceptual questions, questions related to learning thinking skills, reasoning and creativity, measuring higher levels of thinking, and hands-on activities. In addition to consolidating and deepening learning, the assessment method in the Singapore Mathematics Curriculum also promotes metacognition (Ministry of Education Singapore, 2013).
4) Comparison
At this stage, by summarizing components, the information examined in the previous sections are classified in terms of similarities and differences and base on elements of mathematics curriculum - goals, content, teaching-learning strategies and evaluation-, in Iran and Singapore.
1-Goals
Table 3
Comparison of Goals in the mathematics curriculum of Iran and Singapore
Goals |
Iran |
Singapore |
Expressing goals in an ideal way |
* |
* |
Definite commitment to the curriculum document for compiling the content of math textbooks |
* |
* |
Focus on cognitive goals and amount of information and mathematical knowledge |
* |
- |
importance of problem solving as a main goal of mathematics education |
- |
* |
Development and application of metacognitive skills through problem solving approach |
_ |
* |
Special attention to attitude’s goals in boosting confidence and interest in mathematics |
- |
* |
Selection and sequencing of goals according to the characteristics of learners |
- |
* |
Nurture mathematical ideas and create opportunities to deepen the student's understanding and knowledge |
- |
* |
Provide mathematical concepts and skills for application in everyday life |
- |
* |
Support the continuous learning of mathematics and connection between mathematical ideas and other subjects |
- |
* |
According to Table 3, out of a total of 11 goals, Iran and Singapore are similar in two targets and different in the others. The most important similarity is related to the active role of the formal education system of both countries in designing the goals of mathematics education. Thus, authors and curriculum planners are required to have the approval of the Ministry of Education and to match the content of math textbooks with the national curriculum document. The most important differences of two countries can be mentioned as follows:
In Singapore, “problem solving” is the primary goal of teaching mathematics and paving the way for the growth of life skills in the 21st century. Therefore, all reasoning processes, thinking skills, approaches; numerical, algebraic, geometric, statistical concepts; skills; attitudes and metacognition are related to a general goal, that is "problem solving". This strategy should prepare students for acceptance of out-of-school living conditions - which require the selection and use of appropriate concepts and skills. In Iran, “problem solving” is considered as one of the goals of an independent process and therefore it has been considered to some extent in content of school textbooks.
Another important difference between Iran and Singapore is the focus on "attitude". Mathematical goals in Iran focus more on cognitive goals and amount of information and knowledge and less attention is paid to attitudinal goals in mathematics, but in Singapore, strengthening self-confidence, belief and positive attitude towards mathematics in students and teachers is important. This attitude helps to keep people in the mood and to use math to solve problems. In Singapore, believing in and appreciating the value of mathematics has increased one's confidence and motivation to use this science, and has created an interest and perseverance in solving life problems using mathematics. Other differences between the two countries include levels of goals - taking into account the characteristics of learners. In Iran, the goals in terms of structure and content are set equally for all students, but in Singapore, the breadth and depth of math education goals change at each stage, depending on the ability, interest, and confidence of the learners.
According to Table 4, both countries pursue the content in mathematics curriculum which is selected, organized, and taught based on predetermined educational goals. Iran and Singapore also have some differences in the content of primary school mathematics textbooks as follow:
One of the important differences is that in Iran, content is the main axle of teaching and learning, but in Singapore the main emphasis is on learning problem-solving skills. Therefore, in this country, the teacher focuses on teaching math skills and processes to learners rather than transferring content. This shows what is expected of students in terms of processes and quality of work. Other differences between the two countries' math textbooks include sequences in content levels - according to the different needs and abilities of students. The content of math textbooks in Singapore covers fewer topics but is taught to learners with more in-depth. Also in Iran, the content of math textbook is the same for all students on the same basis, but in Singapore, it has a spiral approach at different levels, so that advanced concepts and skills are based on basic foundations- with regards to learners’ needs and abilities. This sequential gives the opportunity to pupils for use practice skills.
Table 4
Comparison of Content in the mathematics curriculum of Iran and Singapore
Content |
Iran |
Singapore |
Determining content based on educational goals |
* |
* |
Mathematical concepts and processes as a important parts of mathematics content |
* |
* |
Content contains learning experiences according to level and needs of learners |
- |
* |
Focus on content as a main core of training and learning |
* |
- |
Organize practical programs in content |
- |
* |
Develop understanding and application of mathematics through connection between mathematical ideas and other subjects |
_ |
* |
Content emphasis on competency development through problem solving |
- |
* |
More emphasis on pupil metacognition development and self-regulation |
- |
* |
Another important difference is the connection and interconnectedness of content framework. The content framework in Singapore is based on the application of the problem-solving method, which emphasizes five interrelated components - concepts, practice of mathematical skills and processes, attitudes, and metacognition. The problem-solving tasks are set up for a deep understanding of the concepts and development of various mathematical ideas. Communications and their applications expose students to a variety of learning experiences - such as useful activities and tools - to relate abstract concepts to learning experiences. This process balances content and skills. In Iran, the components of problem solving (problem design, data collection, hypothesis making, hypothesis testing and inference) do not have a balanced distribution. Therefore, due to this content, problem solving skills are not well taught.
Table 5
Comparison of learning methods in the mathematics curriculum of Iran and Singapore
Learning methods |
Iran |
Singapore |
Support development of communication skills by creating opportunities to collaborate with each other and present own ideas |
* |
* |
Supporting active role of student in learning methods |
* |
* |
Emphasis on textbooks during teaching |
* |
- |
Provide opportunities for students to develop learning skills in mathematics |
- |
* |
Development of metacognition and self-leadership to enhance learning |
- |
* |
Focus of training on self-directed learning in students |
- |
* |
Teaching adequate with differences in students' learning |
- |
* |
Attention to conceptual understanding and connection of teaching with real world |
- |
* |
According to Table 5, Iran and Singapore are similar in supporting the active and voluntary role of students in the learning process and effective interaction with teachers, peers and school environment. Some of the most important differences between two countries in teaching and learning methods are as below:
One of the important differences between two countries is role and method of teaching. In Iran, the teacher is the source of knowledge and axis of class. The teacher begins her/his teaching by reviewing previous sessions or giving an introduction, and teaches the new content or skills. In Singapore, the trend in classrooms is learning-centric. The role of teacher is to encourage and guide pupils to take more responsibility for learning. The teaching method is based on an interactive process that focuses on student learning. In this process, teachers use a wide range of teaching methods to engage students in the learning process.
Another difference in the teaching methods of two countries is allocation of appropriate opportunities to develop self-regulatory learning habits in students. In Singapore, students are given the opportunity to collaborate with each other and present their ideas using mathematical methods. Sometimes these opportunities are the focus of practicing or solving real-world problems that are forced upon students. These exercises - in addition to gaining skills - can be motivating and entertaining. Through this process, students have ample opportunity to strengthen their thinking skills and to deepen their understanding of mathematics by discovering new ways. In Iran, the main emphasis is on teaching the textbook during teaching - rather than providing opportunities for learning experiences for students. Therefore, students are given less opportunity to explore ways to solve problems. Another difference is attention to students' individual differences in learning. In Singapore, learners are noticed by the teacher in terms of different levels and speeds of learning. Therefore, the teacher training method is designed in such a way that students can move forward according to their abilities. In Iran, the teaching method is applied equally to all students.
Table 6
Comparison of Assessment methods in the mathematics curriculum of Iran and Singapore
Assessment |
Iran |
Singapore |
Assessment as an integral part of teaching and learning process |
* |
* |
Purpose of assessment is to measure learning ability |
* |
- |
Assessment helps students improve their learning |
- |
* |
Attention to external evaluations to match qualifications needed to live in the new century |
- |
* |
Evaluation as a structural tool for providing qualitative feedback |
- |
* |
Emphasis on memorizing and designing convergent questions |
* |
- |
Set meaningful and operational tasks in evaluation |
- |
* |
Emphasis on peer assessment or self-assessment as part of learning process |
_ |
* |
In Iran and Singapore, assessment is important to identify and determine students' learning. Continuing assessment during class activities is also important in both countries. There are also differences in the way the two countries evaluate: Assessment in Singapore is an essential part of the interactive teaching and learning process. In this ongoing process, teachers gather information about student learning to support effective teaching. These rich and timely feedbacks show what stage students are at and what needs to be done to improve their learning. In Iran, evaluation means measuring the level of learning ability in students and is less done to identify the quality of learning.
One of the differences is the scope of evaluation. Evaluation is more widespread in Singapore and is not easily implemented through traditional methods. In this country, the method of evaluating classroom activities is integrated in different ways. Teachers use divergent and responsive questions, and students are assessed through qualitative feedback - such as doing a skill, judging an idea, developing a story, or evaluating how they are learning. Integrating performance appraisal into the learning process provides students with new learning experiences. In Iran, this breadth and depth does not exist in the way of qualitative feedback and the evaluation system mainly tends to use traditional tests and convergent questions.
Another difference between the evaluation systems of selected countries is the effect of evaluation on students' self-esteem. In Singapore, further assessment focuses on creating learning opportunities and students' reflection on how to improve their learning. For this reason, the assessment method influences students' learning motivation and makes them aware of their strengths and weaknesses. This assessment method strengthens learners' confidence and interest in learning mathematics. In Iran, the results of assessments are more important than the assessment process and therefore assessment is more focused on identifying students' knowledge performance and determining whether their answers are correct or incorrect.
One method to develop and rebuild an educational program is to use successful experiences of different educational systems. Also, attention to the similarities and differences in curriculum’s structure is essential for development of education. In main goal of present study was considering the most important points of similarities and differences in mathematics curriculum dimensions of Iran and Singapore. The results can be examined from the perspective of different indicators:
The first research finding highlighted that the most common aspects of mathematics curriculum in two countries is related to the goals. One of the common goals of the Iran-Singapore Mathematics Curriculum is to transform and achieve some of the basic competencies in developing thinking skills and creative activities. The main differences between selected countries in the goals of Mathematics education are related to supporting the growth of the acquired competencies needed to live in the 21st century and methods of understanding and applying mathematics to develop metacognition and self-direction.
Another fundamental difference between two educational systems is position of the "problem solving" skill in the mathematics education process. As a specific process goal in math curriculum, Singapore has been able to take math learning to a higher level by emphasizing learning "problem solving" skills. In fact, the goal is not just to teach problem-solving skills, but to create coherence between content and skills, and to be careful and focused on the steps to arrive at an answer - like a mathematician - that strengthens thinking skills and discovery of great ideas. Learning occurs through focus, spending more time, and trying to understand the subject in depth - not just looking at a large number of topics - (CCSSI, 2014). In this regard, Reyhani, Ahmadi, & Karami Zarandi (2010) point out that problem solving is valuable when one knows what steps has taken to arrive at an answer and what the reason is. On the other hand, by increasing the emphasis on problem-solving skills, students gain the ability to formulate, represent, and solve mathematical problems in relation to topics inside and outside of mathematics. It also helps them experience more diversity and creativity in an active learning environment. This finding is in line with research finding of Coffland & Xie (2015) who stated that special attention to the processes in the mathematics curriculum depends on the knowledge, skills and attitudes that students gain from learning mathematics in school. In addition to understanding and applying content, these processes can improve mental development and enhance creativity in learners. In Iran, training of "problem solving" skills still does not have a special place in the national document as well as teacher teaching methods. It seems that in order to change teaching methods, in addition to improving the beliefs and attitudes of teachers, it is necessary to change the views of students, parents, curriculum planners and public.
Another finding of the present study is flexibility in leveling the goals of Singapore Mathematics Education, which provides meaningful learning opportunities for students to improve skills and abilities according to their interests and talents. This different approach gives them the opportunity to design different strategies for solving a problem and to learn how can manage ambiguity and complexity in the real world by simplifying problems. Research by Hollenbeck, Wray & Fey (2010) and Weber, Inglis & Mejia-Ramos (2014) also showed that when people understand the mathematical connection to real situations will continue to learn it in the future to provide the opportunity to learn mathematics in their areas of interest. Thus, the Singaporean education system, by cultivating a set of socio-emotional skills, values, and competencies, employs a framework in its mathematics education that directs students' interest in the quality of education identifies and applies.
The research findings also confirm this fact that despite lack of attention to the scope of attitudes in goals of Iran Mathematics curriculum, cultivating a positive attitude towards mathematics has strengthened the confidence of learners in Singapore. Singaporean pupils also have different starting points in learning content, so the math curriculum provides different paths and choices to support each student to maximize learning motivation. This can provide a meaningful perspective on the joy of learning for students and pave the way for their success and metacognitive development. On the other hand, according to the research findings, combining performance appraisals in education and avoiding focusing on score results in Singapore reduced stress in students and increased their interest in learning. Thus, the performance of Singaporean students at the international level has led to successive successes in achieving superior results in the international exams of TIMSS & PISA. This finding is in line with finding of Shirazi et al. (2016) who, while pointing to the poor performance of Iranian students in international exams such as TIMSS, emphasize that there is a direct relationship between a positive attitude towards the subject and students' performance.
It is also inferred from the research by Lahdemaki (2019) and Youkhanaa, Leifkesb, & Enrique. (2018) that one of the reasons for decrease in interest in learning and loss of creativity is using inappropriate methods in evaluation. Singapore's education system, by taking initiatives and focusing on the quality of learning and providing a student-centered learning model, has been able to stimulate learners' desire to learn mathematics. Despite succeeding in international exams, this education system is still evolving to prepare students for the more complex socio-economic environment of the 21st century, while continuing to be able and willing to meet emerging demands of the knowledge-based global economy. In fact, Singapore's education policy focuses on the growth of human resources and seeks to familiarize students with the country's cultural, economic and social needs in order to provide them with the skills needed to meet those needs. According to the research findings, the need to change the structure of the mathematics curriculum in primary schools of Iran is evident. One of these priorities is to use a coherent, continuous and relevant process in the mathematics education program that emphasizes teaching "problem solving" skills and using themes to acquire life skills needed in the 21st century. It is also suggested that the training of math teachers to use new teaching methods, new teaching tools and optimize their skills to assess students' learning should be considered by curriculum planners. The math curriculum needs to be revised so that the classroom becomes a place that brings students closer to understanding and applying mathematics.
-